Stephan van de Ven

Building for Plurality

You built your community with someone in mind.

Maybe it was the professional looking to sharpen a specific skill. Maybe it was the practitioner wanting to go deeper with peers. Maybe it was the curious person who found your work and couldn’t look away. You had a picture of them when you started.

Then more people showed up.

They weren’t quite the profile you imagined, but they were drawn to what you were building. They found meaning in it. They started contributing. And slowly, the picture you had began to blur.

This is the moment that defines what kind of community builder you are.


The tension

When a community starts to attract more types of people than it was designed for, something shifts. Some of your original members begin to disengage, not because the quality dropped, but because the focus feels different. The edges have softened. The themes have spread. Someone asks a question that surprises you, and you realize: this place has become something larger than what you built.

That’s not a problem. That’s a signal.


What plurality actually looks like

In the communities I’ve worked with and been part of, the range is almost always wider than the founder expected.

There are practitioners who came to sharpen their craft. Solopreneurs building future-proof systems. Writers wanting to leave something behind. Neurodivergent people who finally found a framework that fits how their mind works. People who came for the content and stayed for the connection. People who came for the connection and discovered the content. People who came to learn, and turned out to have more to teach than anyone expected.

Every single one of them was drawn by the same gravitational force — the founder’s language, their way of framing things. If it connects at all, it pulls you in. That’s how a star works.

What they came for, and what they need now, is different for each of them. And that’s where building for plurality begins: not in the design, but in the recognition.


The pivot: from builder to conditions holder

There’s a moment when the community has outgrown the model you built it on. You’re running one monthly office hour. Then two. Then three. The formats have multiplied. The conversations have spread beyond the original scope. It feels a bit messy.

This is when you need to stop building and start holding.

The shift from community builder to conditions holder is not a failure of focus. It’s a maturation. A builder constructs within limits they’ve defined. A conditions holder creates the environment in which many different things can grow, and gets out of the way.

What does that require? Knowing your people. Not just their demographics — what motivates them, what brings them here, what they want to learn, what they want to give, what makes them come alive. When you build for plurality, you know this intimately. You can speak their language. You can tailor the feed.


The garden

Think of it this way. You started with violets. You know exactly what violets need: how much light, how much water, what soil. You’ve been feeding them well.

Then roses arrived. And lilies. And sunflowers. And gladioli.

They can all feed from what you give the violets, but they’ll only absorb sixty or eighty percent of what they actually need. If you want them to truly grow, you start tailoring. You develop a feed for the roses. A different formula for the lilies. You don’t have to give each one a hundred percent from day one, but you start paying attention to what they need, and you give it to them intentionally.

What happens in that garden? Cross-pollination. Unexpected connections. A richness that no single flower type could produce on its own.

A homogeneous community can have great depth. A community of practice focused on one thing has real value. But if your platform has multiple entry points, if people with different purposes are already arriving, a homogeneous approach will starve half of them. Not through malice, through omission.


Two communities that got this right

L&D Shakers started as a learning and development community. Over time, people who weren’t L&D practitioners arrived — L&D-adjacent, drawn by the overlap with lifelong learning, with connection, with practice. New formats emerged, not because the founders planned them, but because members raised their hands. A sandbox for people who wanted to run workshops. Expert thought labs. Local hubs in Amsterdam, Barcelona, and beyond.

The key wasn’t a master plan. It was recognising the signals for what they were: people wanting to contribute, to take ownership, to serve a need that wasn’t being met. They invited those people in. Over time, the community became genuinely decentralised, power and voice distributed among stewards and members alike.

LYT, Linking Your Thinking, tells a similar story from a different angle. A PKM community built around one person’s methodology, it draws teachers, solopreneurs, writers, neurodivergent thinkers, AI practitioners, people working through things, people building businesses, and more. All pulled by the same gravitational language. They came for different reasons. They need different things. The community now has 1,600+ members from 60+ countries, not despite that plurality, but because of it.


The one move that changes everything

Acknowledge that more types of people are here than you originally built for.

That’s it. Everything else follows from that recognition. Once you see it, you face a real choice: do you stay focused on the profiles you started with? Or do you begin designing for the plurality that’s already arrived?

Neither answer is wrong. A sharp, focused community with a clear profile is powerful. But if you feel the pull to facilitate more, if the signals keep coming, then you start creating spaces. You feed the roses the way roses need to be fed. You make room for the gladioli. You hold the conditions for all of it, and you watch what grows.


The journey

The energy and momentum you’re building is going to be much bigger than you imagine.

Your impact will be greater than you planned for. Building a community that recognises plurality changes you and challenges you. You will reach heights you didn’t expect to.

Embrace it.